Legal Opinion

Matter of Long

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1993No. 20S00-9006-DI-403PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The Respondent, William R. Long, was charged in a Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action with numerous violations of the Rules of Professional Responsibility for Attorneys at Law. A hearing officer was appointed pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11)(b), and, following hearing, he tendered to this Court his findings of fact and conclusions of law. This matter is now before this Court for final determination. Neither the Respondent nor the Disciplinary Commission have challenged the hearing officer's report.

When neither party challenges the hearing…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Carter v. RossSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Matter of ShaulIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of ShumateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Matter of LevyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In the Matter of Floyd Allen Tew, Jr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API