United States v. Phillip D. Banks
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Phillip D. Banks appeals his sentence following our remand of this case for re-sentencing. Previously, in United States v. Bradford, 246 F.3d 1107, 1111-12, 1115 (8th Cir.2001), we affirmed Banks’s jury convictions for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and distribution of a controlled substance, but remanded the case to the District Court -for resentencing in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). At Banks’s initial sentencing, the District Court imposed a mandatory minimum sentence of twenty years…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Fortino E. Diaz, United States of America v. Robert R. LohrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. MCI Telecommunications and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Willie Roy WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jose Carrasco, Also Known as Demetrio, United States of America v. Jose GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- State v. FeblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- United States v. CroxfordDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2004
- United States v. Losoya-ManciasDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2004
- Morris v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.