Legal Opinion

United States v. Fortino E. Diaz, United States of America v. Robert R. Lohr

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2002No. 00-2188, 00-2317PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Chief Judge.

Fortino Diaz and Robert' Lohr (Lohr) appeal their sentences that resulted from their convictions of various crimes committed in furtherance of a conspiracy to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine. A panel of this court originally affirmed the sentences, but we granted rehearing en banc in order to resolve an apparent conflict among our cases. We now reinstate the panel opinion.

I

Diaz and Lohr were indicted and tried along with two other defendants, Daniel Sherman and Vanessa Lohr. After trial in the district court, 2 all the defendants were convicted of conspiracy to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Fabian Aguayo-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. John F. ParolinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Abraham HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Jaja Zambrowski Davis, Morris Ramsey, a.k.a. "Fade"(amended 5/12/2003)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Dodge Caravan Grand Se/sport Van, Vin 1b4gp44g2yb7884560 Erin Clemons, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API