Legal Opinion
United States v. Losoya-Mancias
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided August 25, 2004No. C4-02-050PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Arnaldo Losoya-Mancias’ (“Mancias”) motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. The motion was filed on August 2, 2004. On August 3, 2004, the Court reviewed the motion and ordered the Government to file an answer. On August 12, 2004, the United States filed a response requesting that the Court deny Mancias’ motion for post-conviction relief. Mancias submitted a reply brief on August 23, 2004. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Cosme OrdazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Tyler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- State v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- State v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- United States v. OrdazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005