Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Maryland Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

This case was most fully and ably argued, but it does not appear to us that there is any serious difficulty presented. There is little if any contention in regard to the controlling facts. Of course if it be admitted, as contended on the part of the appellant, that the contract or policy by which the appellee bound itself to pay the annuity is ultra vires and therefore void, or that the instrument itself was not properly executed, or that an annuity cannot be created or granted by parol, but must be by deed, there might be some room for controversy; but we not only do not admit any of these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rittler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  2. Penniman v. WinnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Curtis v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Manheim v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  4. American State Bank of Bloomington v. National Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  5. Hockaday v. SchloerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API