Legal Opinion

Curtis v. New York Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1914PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.

On February 16, 1905, Samuel D. Jenness, the plaintiff’s testate, who was then fifty-four years of age, applied to the defendant company for a five year single premium endowment policy for $5,000. The premium for this policy would have been $4,636.45. Under it Jenness would have been entitled to $5,000 if living at the end of five years from its date, and the beneficiaries named in the application would have been entitled to that sum in case of his death during the five year period. After a prescribed medical examination this application was declined.

Subsequently Jenness made written…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carr v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Commonwealth v. WetherbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Lord v. DallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  4. Briggs v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Lee v. KirbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Cleary v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. State v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Daniel v. Life Ins. Co. of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Gregg v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API