Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Gibbs

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 20, 1934No. [No. 120, October Term, 1933.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The constitutionality of a tax imposed by Baltimore City on the interest of a resident receiving income during life from intangible property held in trust in another state is contested in this case, and the facts are presented in an agreed statement. The tax has been imposed under section 8(h) of article 81 of the Code, as revised by the Act of 1929 (Code [Supp. 1929], art. 81, sec. 1 et seq.), chapter 226: “In case intangible personal property shall ho held by any non-resident of this State in trust for any resident of this State, the value of the interest therein of such resident of this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Baldwin v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. White v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Wasena Housing Corp. v. LevayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Blaustein v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Wood v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API