Legal Opinion

In re House Bill No. 250

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1899No. 4037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original Proceeding. Question from the (governor.

1Per curiam

The twelfth general assembly passed, and sent to the governor for his approval, House Bill No. 250, entitled, “ An act to provide for the better assessment of property for revenue, to create a state board of assessors,’’etc. Entertaining .grave doubt of its constitutionality, the governor has transmitted a communication requesting our opinion, stating, inter alia, that, to Ms mind, the question is ‘■‘■publici juris, and one which imperatively demands judicial determination prior to the approval of the act.” Coinciding with the conclusion of the chief executive that the question is important…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Appropriations by General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Burritt v. Commissioners of State ContractsIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Ryan v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. In re Fire & Excise CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cindi MARKWELL, Secretary of the Senate and Leroy M. Garcia, Jr., President of the Senate v. John B. COOKE, Senator Robert S. Gardner, Senator and Chris Holbert, Senate Minority LeaderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  2. Daly v. BeeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People ex rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. State Board of EqualizationPueblo County District Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API