Legal Opinion

Burritt v. Commissioners of State Contracts

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1887PublishedCited by 31 opinions

This was a petition, filed in this court, asking for issue of a writ of mandamus, on the grounds and for the purposes fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shope

The relator, Hiram B. Burritt, is shown to be a justice of the peace of Lake county, and files this petition, in his own behalf, as such officer, and in behalf of all town officers in counties under township organization, and of all justices of the peace in counties not under township organization, to compel the Commissioners of State Contracts to contract for and obtain, for the use of such town officers and justices of the peace, copies of a certain book known as “Haines’ Township Organization Laws, ” as provided in a certain concurrent resolution passed and adopted by the General Assembly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spangler v. JacobyIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Legg v. Mayor of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Board of Supervisors of Schuyler County v. People ex rel. Rock Island & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Board of Supervisors v. HeenanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  5. Indiana Central Railway Co. v. PottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Owens v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. A.L.I.V.E. VoluntaryAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Burke v. SnivelyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. City of Chicago v. ReevesIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State ex rel. Ekern v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API