Legal Opinion
Reed v. Pennwalt Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 22, 1979No. 2659-3PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoe, J.
Defendant Pennwalt Corporation (Pennwalt) owns a chemical manufacturing plant. It supplies caustic soda to Rogers of Walla Walla (Rogers), a food processing plant, whose primary product is frozen french fries. Rogers is not a party to this action. The caustic soda, sold in bulk to Rogers, arrives in Walla Walla via railroad tank cars or tank truckloads. Upon arrival it is transferred to bulk holding tanks with capacities up to 15,000 gallons. From the bulk storage tank, it is piped through a sealed system to tumblers where it is used in a potato peeling and washing system in diluted amounts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Sterling Jackson v. Coast Paint and Lacquer Company, a Corporation, and Reliance Universal Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Little v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Haugen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ramsey v. Georgia Southern University Advanced Development CtrSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- Betty Adams, Joseph Adams v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Goodbar v. Whitehead Bros.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
- Reed v. Pennwalt Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.