Legal Opinion
Drake v. Indiana Natural Resources Commission
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 1983No. 1-183A1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Petitioner-appellant landowner, Mervin E. Drake (Drake), appeals from the dismissal of his action for judicial review in favor of respondent-appellee, the Indiana Natural Resources Commission (State Agency), and intervening respondent-appellee drillers, W.L. Dillier and Francis M. Pierce (Dillier and Pierce). The Hancock Circuit Court granted dismissal of Drake's action based on a lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 12(B)(1) and (B)(2). We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Dillier and Pierce are the owners and operators of an oil…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Enderle v. SharmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Thompson v. Medical Licensing BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Glass v. Continental Assurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Warram v. StantonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Justak v. BochnowskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crowder v. Rockville Training CenterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Park v. Medical Licensing Board of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp. v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bayley v. FoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Seattle Painting Co. v. Commissioner of LaborIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.