Seattle Painting Co. v. Commissioner of Labor

This case presents an issue of first impression: whether the filing of a petition for judicial review and a copy of the administrative order is a sufficient “record” under IND. CODE § 4-21.5-5-13 (1993). Because the majority dismisses Seattle Painting’s petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without: (1) allowing for corrections or modifications pursuant to IC § 4 — 21.5—5—13(g); and (2) determining whether the petition for judicial review and the administrative order are a sufficient manifestation of the error complained of, I dissent.

I

IC § i-21.5-5-13

The majority concludes that…