Legal Opinion
Lemus v. Timberland Apartments, L.L.C.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 19, 2012No. Case No. 3:10-cv-01071-PKPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
On April 26, 2012, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued an Amended Findings and Recommendation (# 128) recommending that plaintiffs motion for attorney fees (# 102) be granted in part and denied in part, and that defendants’ motion for attorney fees (# 107) be denied as to defendant Polygon Northwest and granted in part and denied in part as to W.R. Town-*1172homes F, L.L.C.’s (WR Townhomes). The parties have timely filed objections and responses. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When a party objects…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunigan v. Mississippi Valley State UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2021
- Herrman v. LifeMap Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Lake v. FontesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Smeenk v. FaughtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Wilson v. Decibels Of Oregon, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019