Herrman v. LifeMap Assurance Company
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION DEBRA HERRMANN, Plaintiff, No. 3:17-cv-01336-MO v. OPINION AND ORDER LIFEMAP ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MOSMAN, J., Before me is Plaintiff Debra Herrman’s Motion for Attorney Fees [ECF 28]. This case is on remand from the Ninth Circuit “with instructions to reconsider Herrman’s fee motion under the correct legal standard.” Ninth Cir. Remand Mem. [ECF 51] at 1—2. Previously, I considered the five Hummell' factors and denied Ms. Herrman’s fee motion. In a split decision, the Ninth Circuit held that in addition…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.