Legal Opinion
Smeenk v. Faught
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 24, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01466Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION . PIETER SMEENK, Case No. 1:17-cv-01466-CL Plaintiff, v. OPINION & ORDER MICHAEL FAUGHT, and THE CITY OF ASHLAND, Defendants. CLARKE, Magistrate Judge. This case comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (#120). Plaintiff Pieter Smeenk filed this action on September 18, 2017, alleging violations of free speech rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, retaliation for engaging in whistleblower activity under ORS 659A.203, and common law wrongful termination (#1). Litigation proceeded for nearly 1.5 years,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.