Legal Opinion
County Commissioners v. Panda-Brandywine, L.P.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 19, 2009No. Civil Case AW-08-3369PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
Petitioner, County Commissioners of Charles County, Maryland (“County” or “Petitioner”) brought this action for declaratory judgment seeking a determination of its rights and obligations under a contract with Respondent, Panda-Brandy-wine, L.P. (“Panda” or “Respondent”). Before this Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) and Respondent’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court heard oral arguments on these motions on September 29,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mellen v. BuntingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sprint Nextel Corporation v. Wireless Buybacks HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Gibson Island Corporation v. Group Home on Gibson Island, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020