Legal Opinion

Skyles v. Kincaid

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtB.ossman, J.

Attached to the answer is a copy of report of the board of commissioners; accompanying the latter is a copy of a brief written agreement entered into by the widow and three children. Defendants contend that this latter document is protected by the parol evidence rule and that hence all recitals in the two orders in excess of the agreements set forth in this memorandum must be ignored. Whether this document constitutes the final repository or integration of the agreement of the parties is a matter which tbe trial judge will determine when evidence of the surrounding circumstances puts him in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bramwell v. RowlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Abernethy v. OrtonOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Grand Prize Hydraulic Mines v. BoswellOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bush v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Calvary Baptist Church v. SaxtonOregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garner v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Fox v. LasleyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Gillespie v. WindustDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
  4. Bly v. Travellers' Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Milton Warehouse Co. v. Basche-Sage Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API