(PC) Wright v. Deforest

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ATHELSTAN A. WRIGHT, No. 2:24-cv-0420 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 M. DEFOREST, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s amended 18 complaint is before the Court. As discussed below, plaintiff is granted an opportunity to proceed 19 on the claims identified as cognizable, or he may elect to file a second amended complaint. 20 I. SCREENING STANDARDS 21 The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking…