Legal Opinion
Fischer v. City of Ketchum
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 2005No. 29469PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Idaho Falls, September 2004 Term.
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
This is a case involving review of a conditional use permit application and a design review application submitted by Douglas Delmonte. Delmonte proposed to build a four-story duplex on his property located in a residential zone within the Mountain Overlay District and the Avalanche Zone District that are governed by specific provisions of the Ketchum Zoning Code. Because the Ketchum City Planning and Zoning Commission (Commission) failed to request an Idaho engineer’s certification prior to granting the conditional use permit, the Commission could not legally grant the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Castaneda v. Brighton Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Friends of Farm to Market v. Valley CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Bogner v. State Dept. of Revenue and Tax.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- South Fork Coalition v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Lockhart v. Department of Fish and GameIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Neighbors for a Healthy Gold Fork v. Valley CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Cowan v. Board of Com'rs of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Hobson Fabricating Corp. v. SE/Z Construction, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.