Legal Opinion

In Re Plummer

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1947No. Crim. 2475PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that there was no competent evidence submitted to the committing magistrate sufficient to constitute cause to hold petitioner to answer (Pen. Code, §§ 871, 872) for trial in the superior court on a charge of murder.

The petitioner herein did not testify at the preliminary hearing. The record discloses that the evidence adduced was (a) a statement made to a police inspector by a codefendant out of petitioner’s presence, (b) petitioner’s statement to the inspector that he was not guilty of murder, (c) petitioner’s statement that he had…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. SassounianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Dong Haw v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API