Legal Opinion
National Zinc Co. v. Moody
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 2, 1976No. 49319PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
Petitioners National Zinc Company, Inc. (respondent below) and the State Insurance Fund (insurance carrier) seek vacation of award based on a determination of twenty-two percent (22%) permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. Industrial Court, sitting en banc, affirmed the trial court’s order and award.
Walter Moody, respondent (claimant below), was a twenty-four year employee of National Zinc Company, Inc. He worked on the metal dock for some seven years. He was exposed to smoke and fumes on a regularly continuing basis in performing his work. Dr. B. gave a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gragg v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Reints v. DiehlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Kile v. CotnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Logan County v. YorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Tulsa Linen Service Company v. KrothSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Simpson v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980