Legal Opinion

Breunig v. American Family Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1970No. 43PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

There is no question that Erma Yeith was subject at the time of the accident to an insane delusion which directly affected her ability to operate her car in an ordinarily prudent manner and caused the accident. The specific question considered by the jury under the negligence inquiry was whether she had such foreknowledge of her susceptibility to such a mental aberration, delusion or hallucination as to make her negligent in driving a car at all under such conditions.

At the trial Erma Yeith testified she could not remember all the circumstances of the accident and this was confirmed by her…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. ShoffnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Keplin v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Williams v. . HaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lambrecht v. Estate of KaczmarczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lutz v. Shelby Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Jankee v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gould v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. CarprueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API