Legal Opinion

Farncomb v. Stern

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

JSrror to the County Court of Arapahoe County. Action for forcible entry and unlawful detainer and for damages thereby occasioned. Finding and judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring the cause- to, this court by writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott

1. The review of this cause cannot extend beyond the record proper. The trial below was to the court without a jury by consent of parties. The record brought to this court shows no objection or exception of any kind during the trial. No objection or exception was taken to the finding or judgment as rendered; nor was any motion made for a new trial. At no stage of the proceeding in the trial court was the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding questioned in any manner. Under such circumstances it is well settled that tins court will not review the judgment upon the evidence. Hoppie…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Green v. TaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Dustin v. CowdrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  4. Warren v. KellyTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Law v. BrinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ryan Gulch Reservoir Co. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Nelson v. First National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Cripple Creek Syndicate Mining & Milling Co. v. SnyderColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Cripple Creek Syndicate Mining & Milling Co. v. SnyderColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Nelson v. First National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API