Law v. Brinker
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from County Court of Arapahoe County. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.
We cannot review the judgment in this case upo.n the evidence. A jury was expressly waived by the parties, and the cause was tried to the court. . No exception was taken or allowed to the judgment, and we are therefore without jurisdiction to consider the testimony except as hereinafter indicated. Session Laws 1879, p. 225, sec. 24; Colorado Springs Co. v. Hopkins, 5 Col. 206. See, also, construction of a similar statute by the supreme court of the territory. Phelps v. Spruance, 1 Col. 414.
The bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all the testimony; and for this reason, also, we are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Townsley v. SumrallSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Grant v. EllicottNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Nowak v. Excelsior Stone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
- Diversy v. LoebIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jerome v. BohmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Tolerton & Stetson Co. v. Anglo-California Bank, Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Reed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- Leonhardt v. SmallTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Whitehead v. JessupColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.