Legal Opinion

Bacher v. Office of the State Engineer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2006No. 42699PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether an agent may properly apply for water rights permits on behalf of the actual appropriator. While we conclude that an agent may request permits based on the ultimate user’s need for water, we also adopt the anti-speculation doctrine, which requires the agent to have a contractual or agency relationship with the water’s appropriator. Even though the agent in this case properly applied for a water rights permit on behalf of the appropriator, we conclude that the State Engineer failed to properly consider the evidence in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Barnes v. SabronNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Robert E. v. JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. MorrosNevada Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Great Basin Water Network v. State Eng'rNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Nevada Attorney for Injured Workers v. Nevada Self-Insurers Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Adaven Management, Inc. v. Mountain Falls Acquisition Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. King v. St. ClairNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Andersen Family Associates v. Hugh RicciNevada Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API