Andersen Family Associates v. Hugh Ricci
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Parraguirre, J.:
In this appeal, we address whether an entity can lose its vested rights to utilize certain water flow — rights that it acquired before the adoption of Nevada’s statutory water law scheme — when a permit modifying those rights is canceled and later reinstated pursuant to NRS 533.395. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the cancellation and later reinstatement of a permit modifying an entity’s prestatutory vested water rights cannot result in the entity losing its priority to use that water flow because Nevada law prevents such rights from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kay v. NunezNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Gaines v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Ormsby County v. KearneyNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re Waters of Manse SpringNevada Supreme Court · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- County of Clark v. Howard Hughes Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Sullivan v. Lincoln Cnty. Water Dist.Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
- Albemarle U.S., Inc. v. King, P.E.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Chao v. NevenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- DIAMOND NAT. RES. PROT. AND CONSERVATION ASS'N v. DIAMOND VALLEY RANCH, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.