Legal Opinion

Alli v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 23, 2009No. 01-669CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALLEGRA, Judge.

On August 26, 2008, the court issued an opinion in which it found that plaintiffs had breached their Housing Assistance Payments contracts and associated agreements with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Alli v. United States, 83 Fed.Cl. 250, 279 (2008). The court also indicated that it would “allow defendant to pierce the corporate veil [of BSA Corporation] and hold Dr. [Benjamin] Alii and his wife [Shaki Alii] personally hable for any damages arising under [its] counterclaim.” Id. at 278.

On December 22, 2008, plaintiffs filed a motion for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  4. Alan Meyer v. Berkshire Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Gregory v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API