Legal Opinion
Long v. General Petroleum Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1936No. Civ. 9793PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The defendant, a foreign corporation authorized by this state to transact herein intrastate business, made a motion in the above-entitled action to change the place of trial thereof from the city and county of San Francisco to the county of Los Angeles upon the ground that it was and is a resident of the latter county and has its principal offices and place of business therein. The motion was denied and it has appealed from the order made in that behalf. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling. .
The action is one for damages instituted under the authority of a federal statute known as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Panama Railroad v. VasquezSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. SnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Bohn v. Better Biscuits, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Larson v. Lewis-Simas-Jones Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hamilton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.