Legal Opinion

Hendren v. City of Arkansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. 27,018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action against the defendant city for damages sustained by plaintiff through the action of a mob.

Plaintiff, an admitted simpleton, resides in Arkansas City. For some time prior to the doings involved herein he indulged the fancy that he had histrionic attainments of such high order that some imaginary motion-picture companies were competing for his services, and that one of these planned to wjaylay and kidnap him. This *362delusion quite naturally attracted the attention of several young men and boys of the town, and on the evening…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cherryvale v. HawmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Ramey v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Scott v. CowanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Kretchmar v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Clemm v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Koska v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Seigler v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API