Legal Opinion

State v. Terrell

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 9, 2021No. 122680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

No. 122,680 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ROBERT GLENN TERRELL, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Appellate courts exercise unlimited review on whether a sentence is illegal within the meaning of K.S.A. 22-3504 because it is a question of law. 2. An appellate court must first attempt to ascertain legislative intent through the statutory language enacted, giving common words their ordinary meanings. When a statute is plain and unambiguous, an appellate court should not speculate about the legislative intent behind that clear language, and it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. WetrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. FriersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. State v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TerrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API