Legal Opinion
Hobart Sales and Service v. Harmon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 6, 1962No. 39682PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice.
Under review in this proceeding is the trial tribunal’s determination that claimant’s right to compensation was not barred by the limitation provisions of Tit. 85 O.S.1961 § 43.
The accidental injury for which an award was sought occurred on May 29, 1958. The claim was filed on January 4, 1960. Pursuant to specific direction of his employer, claimant reported on June 1, 1958, to an orthopedic clinic where he was placed under the care of Drs. S and B. When the condition became unresponsive to conservative treatment, surgery was performed on June 7, 1958. A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cupit v. Dancu Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Swafford v. SchoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Wilcox Oil Co. v. FuquaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Indian Drilling Mud Company v. McGrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Bethlehem Supply Company v. ArmbristerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. Anchor Glass Container Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Shank v. Oklahoma Office & Bank Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Lang v. Erlanger Tubular Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Lang v. Erlanger Tubular Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- McGhee v. Oklahoma Metal Heat TreatingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.