Legal Opinion
United States v. Barnhardt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1996No. 96-6127PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Thomas D. Bamhardt (Bamhardt), appearing pro se and having been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, appeals the district court’s Order of March 18, 1996, dismissing his motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
On June 14, 1990, Bamhardt…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Avery W. Vial, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Ben Gary Triestman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.