State v. Mayor of Bayonne
Supreme Court of New Jersey
In error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
This controversy relates to the validity of a sewer assessment made under the sixty-fourth section of the charter of the city of Bayonne. Pamph. L. 1872, p. 719.
By the city charter the cost of the improvement is to be-assessed upon property benefited iu proportion to the benefit received, but property not deriving a present benefit cannot be assessed for any part of its cost until lateral sewers are constructed.
The act of 1887 {Pamph. L., p. 231) provides for cases-where sewers have been or may be constructed in cities, forming a trunk…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- President, Directors, & Co. of Newburgh & Cochecton Turnpike Road v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
- In re ClevelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- Fagen v. Mayor of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Vreeland v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
- Simmons v. Mayor of MillvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- State v. Mayor of Glen RidgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.