Legal Opinion

State v. Mayor of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 21 opinions

'On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The board of street and water commissioners of Jersey City having, on March 5th, 1894, passed an ordinance giving the North Hudson County Railway Company *294permission to lay tracks, erect poles and string wires on several streets of the city, among them Grove street, from Pavonia avenue to the Hoboken line, the prosecutors, owning property on that street, sued out this certiorari to test the legality of the ordinance.

A fundamental question, lying at the basis of matters which we must consider in passing upon the objections of the prosecutors, is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newark Passenger Railway Co. v. BlockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. State v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  3. Read v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mayor of Knoxville v. AfricaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. State ex rel. Mayor of Rutherford v. Hudson River Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  4. Neil v. KleinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. City of Bayonne v. North Jersey, Etc., CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API