Legal Opinion

Vreeland v. Mayor of Bayonne

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 29 Vroom 126. -

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The writ of error in this case is brought to reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered upon proceedings in certiorari to review a municipal assessment for benefits.

The finding of the Supreme Court upon questions of fact is a finality, and this court will not review it in that respect. Moran v. Jersey City, 29 Vroom 653.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is erroneous and must be set aside in so far as it adjudges that assessments for future benefits are illegal and must be vacated.

In Central Land Co. v. Bayonne, 27 Vroom 297, this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moran v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. State v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Town of UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Butler v. Town of MontclairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  3. Seaman v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API