Legal Opinion
Williams v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 8, 1943No. 15524PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The unanimous opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Associate Justice Eishburne :
The action was brought by the respondent, George Williams, as beneficiary, on two insurance, policies insuring the life of Mabel Williams, issued by the appellant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Two causes of action are stated: the first, for the recovery of $370.00 on a policy dated December 18, 1938; and the second for the recovery of $124.00, which is the face amount of a policy dated March 18, 1940. The complaint included none of the special terms and provisions of the policies, but merely alleged…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Worth v. NortonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Thompson Bros. v. Piedmont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Curdts v. Pioneer Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Simpson v. South Carolina Mutual Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
3Cited by5 opinions
- Professional Bankers Corp. v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Crook v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Vic Bailey Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. DeglmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Wolff v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944