Legal Opinion
Dutrisac v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 16, 1981No. C 80-0026 RPAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
AGUILAR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bill Gamble * sued his district union lodge, the International Association of Machinists, District Lodge No. 115 (Union), for breach of the Union’s duty of fair representation, and sued his employer Caterpillar Tractor Company (Caterpillar) for breach of the collective bargaining agreement between Caterpillar and Union claiming that he was wrongfully discharged from his employment with Caterpillar.
Caterpillar and Union are parties to a collective bargaining agreement which provides that Union is the exclusive bargaining representative for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- William Ruzicka, and Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Robesky v. Qantas Empire Airways Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Del Casal v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Norman E. Dutrisac, and Bill Gamble v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., and International Association of MacHinists District Lodge No. 115Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Goolsby v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Karahalios v. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center PresidioDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Foster v. Bowman Transportation Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983
- Long v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Local 141District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.