Wilkerson v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
We have examined this record with great care and, while the volume of testimony appears ominous, and it is replete with objections and exceptions, there is not a question raised that is new or novel and has not been decided adversely to appellant’s contention.
The testimony for the state tends strongly bo prove the defendant’s guilt, exclusive of the testimony of parties who were themselves guilty and testifying for the state. In addition to this is the proven confession of defendant, who admittedly was present with the others at the time of the discovery of the still, and the liquor made on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bruce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Adams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Brooks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Fisher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
- Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947