Brooks v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The principal insistence of defendant is that the state failed to offer proof that the crime was committed within 12 months before the finding of the indictment. The indictment was returned September, 1924. Mindham testified as to time that “it was on Sunday, and it was one day before the September grand jury last year.” The witness was then testifying on the trial in. April, 1925. On cross-examination the witness said he thought it was in the spring of the year. This was sufficient evidence from which the jury might fix the time within the statute of limitation of one year.
It is further…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Newman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilkerson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926