Legal Opinion

Vance v. Estate of Myers

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1972No. 1447PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

The central question in this case concerns the liability of an estate for the torts of a trustee, executor, or administrator.

Appellant brought a tort action against the administrator of the appellee’s estate. The action was filed shortly before the superior court discharged the administrator, thus terminating the administration of the estate. Appellant moved to set aside the decree of discharge and reinstate the administrator until the tort action could be concluded. Appellant’s motion was denied. The issue on appeal is whether the court erred in refusing to set aside…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Wahl v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Dobbs v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Kirchner v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Galdjie v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Barton v. LundAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Johnson v. DorisAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cook v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  5. Matter of Estate of SchieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API