Legal Opinion

Kirchner v. Muller

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1939PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

This is a personal injury action. Plaintiff was injured while walking in front of premises “ owned and controlled by the defendants Muller.” Thirty-eight years before the accident the then owner, without license or permit, instituted a system of draining the rain water from the roof of the building, by conducting it through a pipe at the side of the building and thence through a conduit or drain across the sidewalk to the curb. This conduit was merely a cut in the sidewalk which had as a cover a plank which was loosely laid on top, resting upon flanges which kept it level with the sidewalk.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. O'Brien v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Boyd v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Kellogg v. Church Charity FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Brown v. Guaranty Estates Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Hanson v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
  5. Brown v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API