Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Chilton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1894No. 244PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following statement is substantially correct:

Appellee, R.E. Chilton, plaintiff below, sues H.C. Cross and George A. Eddy, receivers, the Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Company, of Kansas, and the Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Company, of Texas. He alleges that on June 16, 1889, plaintiff desired to send his wife, Susan N. Chilton, and his two little girls, to visit relatives near Newton Creek, on the line of the Dallas Waco Railway, in Dallas County, at which he alleges that passenger trains of said receivers customarily stopped. That plaintiff relied upon the representations of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Union Trust Company v. SoutherSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. GilbertTexas Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. LathamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API