Legal Opinion

Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1917No. 200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHightower, C. J.

This was a suit brought by the appellee, .T. E. Daniel, plaintiff below, against the Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Company, and Frank Andrews, in his capacity as receiver of said railway company, to recover damages; the alleged ground of recovery being that while the properties of said railway company were in the hands of and being operated by said Frank Andrews, in his capacity as receiver of said railway company, appointed by the federal court for the Southern district of Texas, a newsboy on one of- the trains so operated, and.also a conductor on said train, greatly humiliated and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McFadden Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kirby Lumber Co. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. BozemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Dillingham, Receiver v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Baccaratt v. Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. MilbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. UmbersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API