Legal Opinion
Corzine v. Sears, Roebuck and Company
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1969No. 270PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Sears, Roebuck & Company appeals from a judgment awarding workmen’s compensation benefits to the plaintiff, H. C. Corzine. Plaintiff asserts that he sustained compensable injuries as a result of engaging in a fight with a fellow employee.
The occurrence of the fight, its relation to employment, together with injuries claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff as a result of the fight, were the subject of findings by the trial court. With respect to causation the following finding was made:
“12. That in said fight, * * * inflicted injuries upon Plaintiff which caused…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Montano v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Gammon v. Ebasco Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Yates v. MatthewsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Geeslin v. Goodno, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Gallegos v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Adams v. Loffland Brothers Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Malone v. Swift Fresh Meats Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Martinez v. Fluor Utah, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Anderson v. MacKeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Wood v. GandyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.