Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Fluor Utah, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 1977No. 2838PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REUBEN E. NIEVES, District Judge.
The plaintiff workman brings to this court a review of a judgment under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of New Mexico. The judgment reflects a finding for plaintiff of a disability resulting from an accidental injury in the course and scope of his employment on September 10, 1975, and continuing until June 28, 1976, except for a period of time that the plaintiff continued to be employed by the defendant employer. The effect of this determination was that plaintiff was not totally disabled within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. We are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Montano v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Gonzales v. General Motors CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Wood v. Citizens Standard Life Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Niederstadt v. Ancho Rico Consolidated MinesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Wright v. SchultzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Poore v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Trujillo v. Beaty Elec. Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sanchez v. Zanio's Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.