Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Hayden
Texas Supreme Court
Both appellants and appellees obtained writs of error on a judgment modifying, reversing and rendering in part, and in part affirming the judgment for plaintiffs in the trial court from which appeal was taken.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
The history of this litigation -may be seen in 44 Texas Civ. App., 746, and 125 S. W., 993. The writs of error by which the case is brought to this court are from the decision last cited.
Besides Sarah L. Hayden and others as plaintiffs, and "the Houston 011 Companj'- of Texas and others as defendants, there were two sets of interveners, viz.: P. C. Thompson and those acting with him, who will be referred to as the first interveners, and S. M. Kidd and those acting with him, who will be called the second interveners.
The controversy is over the title to the tract of land now in Hardin County,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carlisle v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1864
- Pope v. PopeMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
- Stevens v. GoodenoughSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- Burkett & Murphy v. ScarboroughTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Davis v. BargasTexas Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by50 opinions
- Houston First American Savings v. MusickTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Madison v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Strong v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
- Turner v. Franklin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.