Legal Opinion

Aneco Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2002No. Nos. 01-1572, 01-1681PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Petition granted in part and denied in part, cross-petition granted in part and denied in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER joined. Judge GOODWIN wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge.

On July 12, 1993, Winson Cox applied for a job as an electrician with Aneco, Inc., a non-union contractor. J.A. 1222. Cox was a paid, full-time union organizer for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union Number 606 (“the Union”), J.A. 1226, and he sought employment with Aneco…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Coronet Foods, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Coronet Foods, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  4. National Labor Relations Board,petitioner v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Fayetteville, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. Ferguson Electric Company, Inc., Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aneco Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, Region 12, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 606, Intervenor. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Amicus Curiae. National Labor Relations Board v. Aneco Incorporated, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 606, Intervenor. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API