Arbor Hill Partners v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Con. G. Cholakis, J.
The determination placed in issue by this CPLR article 78 proceeding is found to have been contrary to the meaning and intent of the controlling statute and is further found to be so unreasonable as to be arbitrary. Accordingly, the subject determination is annulled and the matter remanded to the respondents for purposes of redetermination.
The petitioner is a limited-profit housing company organized and existing pursuant to the provisions of the New York State Urban Development Corporation Act (L 1968, ch 179, as amd) and article II of the Private…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hanks v. UrstadtNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Rappaport v. GaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arbor Hill Partners v. New York State Commissioner of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Partners v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- New York State Mortgage Loan Enforcement & Administration Corp. v. Arbor Hill Houses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992