Legal Opinion

Hanks v. Urstadt

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Grumet, J.

Petitioners seek judgment annulling the determination of the respondent Commissioner, restraining the imposition of increased carrying charges and rental, and directing the respondent Commissioner to reconsider the application of respondent Riverbay Corporation for increase in carrying charges by conducting a preliminary hearing in advance of final determination.

Presently, approximately 6,000 units in the development are occupied. Eventually upon the completion of the project, the occupants will number approximately 15,500. The proceeding, representative in nature, is instituted by a portion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Matter of Marburg v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. People Ex Rel. Trustees of Jamaica v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Matter of Neddo v. SchradeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Williams v. White Plains Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greene v. GoodwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Partners v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Arbor Hill Partners v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Davis v. StarrNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API