Legal Opinion

Rappaport v. Gaynor

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.

This is a consolidated application pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR. The petitioners are tenants and landlord of a housing project constructed and operated pursuant to article 2 of the Private Housing Finance Law (limited-profit housing companies). The tenant petitioners seek to review and annul a determination of the respondent, Commissioner of Housing and Community Renewal of the State of New York, which granted an increase in rents. The landlord as petitioner seeks a review and modification of the order granting the increase insofar as it provided that such increase be applied on two…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanks v. UrstadtNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Arbor Hill Partners v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Davis v. StarrNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Independence Plaza North Tenants Ass'n v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API